Legal Opinion

Beulah L. Neville, Amended to Beulah L. Neville Garlinger v. American Barge Line Company, Amended to American Commercial Barge Line Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 12, 1960No. 13012_1Published

Biggs, Chief Judge, dissented from order denying rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

276 F.2d 117

Beulah L. NEVILLE, Amended to Beulah L. Neville Garlinger, Appellee,

v.

AMERICAN BARGE LINE COMPANY, Amended to American Commercial

Barge Line Company, Appellant.

No. 13012.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Dec. 11, 1959.

Decided Feb. 3, 1960, Rehearing Denied April 12, 1960.

Clyde A. Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Hymen Schlesinger, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

1

Pleading diversity of citizenship, appellee, a member of ship's…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sims v. United States of America War Shipping AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. Thomas J. Murphy v. George LightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Beulah L. Neville, Amended to Beulah L. Neville Garlinger v. American Barge Line Company, Amended to American Commercial Barge Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  5. Graham v. Alcoa S. S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API