In Re Ernst
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentBlack, J.
“A child is not a chattel nor subject to ownership as such.”
As 1964 has brought another change of our personnel, a little child may lead the remaining parent-minded — distinguished from child-minded — Brethren from out that legal fog into which they seem to stray when a child custody case arrives here. That child could be little Gerri Ernst. And if Gerri, armed as she is with innocence and supreme legal right, cannot get through to such Brethren as her case comes to decision, then the probate and circuit judges of Michigan — by what they have done and are now doing — ultimately will get…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Corrie v. CorrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- In re GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Weiss v. WeissMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Lewis v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin & Upper MichiganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Bahr v. BahrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re Mark T.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- In Re WeldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.