Legal Opinion

State v. Hurst

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1993No. 18089, 18090Published

1Opinion of the Court

507 N.W.2d 918 (1993)

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Willard HURST, Jr., Defendant and Appellant.

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Telford TOFFLEMIRE, Defendant and Appellant.

Nos. 18089, 18090.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued September 1, 1993.

Decided November 10, 1993.

Mark W. Barnett, Atty. Gen., Charles M. McGuigan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, for plaintiff and appellee.

Stan H. Anker, Rapid City, for defendant and appellant, Hurst.

Curt R. Ewinger, Rice and Ewinger, Aberdeen, for defendant and appellant, Tofflemire.

SABERS, Justice.

Defendants appeal their…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BurtzlaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. Shank & BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. FordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API