Pittman Construction Co. v. Housing Authority of New Orleans
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CHASEZ, Judge.
This appeal involves a claim for attorney’s fees asserted by motion and rule to show cause. Judgment in the amount of $15,734.92 was rendered in favor of movers, Donald P. Brian and Claire Loeb, and against defendant, S. P. Bynum, and Mr. Bynum has appealed.
S. P. Bynum d/b/a Southern Tree and Landscape Company, had a contract with Pittman Construction Company which was involved in litigation. In May of 1956 he retained the law firm of Henriques and Mayo to represent him in that matter. A written contract providing for a contingent fee of 20% of anything recovered was entered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cheramie v. StilesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Succession of ZatarainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Laborde v. AymondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Due v. DueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Liberty Personnel, Inc. v. CHILDREN'S HOSP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Pittman Construction Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966