Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Waugh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1924No. 8465. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This appeal is from an order of the district court of Burleson county sustaining the plea of privilege of A. M. Waugh to be sued in the county of his residence, Harris county.

Appellant filed the suit in Burleson county against George E. Blohn, G. D. Ulrich, and A. M. Waugh as defendants, alleging that Blohn resided in Harris county, that Ulrich and Waugh both resided in Fort Bend County, and claiming venue in Burleson county against all three defendants pursuant to section 7 of article 1830, Revised Statutes, under allegations that a fraud had been committed on him in Burleson county in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Behrens Drug Co. v. Hamilton & McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Craig v. Pittman & Harrison Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Ray v. W. W. Kimball Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Murphy v. DabneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Schumacher Co. v. DoliveTexas Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wise v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Ulrich v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Blohm v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Box v. Deming Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Bankers Protective Life Ins. Co. v. MozingoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API