Legal Opinion
People v. Mitchell
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 15, 1990No. B040820PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Defendant David Reed Mitchell appeals from the judgment following his plea of no contest for possession for sale and sale of cocaine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.) On appeal, Mitchell contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5. We conclude the trial court properly denied the motion and affirm the judgment.
Statement of Facts and Proceedings Below
Mitchell was charged in an information with one count of possession of cocaine for sale. Mitchell moved to suppress the evidence obtained pursuant to Penal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Conway v. Pasadena Humane SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- In re I.H.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- People v. Casas CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.