Legal Opinion · Dissent
Baer v. Chase
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 1, 2006No. 05-2425Published
1DissentAmbro, Circuit Judge
I empathize with Judge Pisano’s predicament (and soon to be frustration). To review, on summary judgment Judge Pisa-no ruled against Baer on each of his claims—ten in all. Our Court affirmed all that Judge Pisano did except for the quasi-contract claim. We remanded that issue to the District Court for consideration of the February 10, 1997 letter that Baer wrote to Chase fourteen months after Chase sent Baer a script that, by 1997, was several stages more developed. In so doing, our Court (per another panel) told Judge Pisano to “analyze[ ] the [February 10, 1997] letter and the circumstances…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weichert Co. Realtors v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Robert v. Baer v. David Chase Chase Films Inc., a Delaware Corporation John Does A-ZCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Midcoast Aviation, Inc. v. General Electric Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Friedlander v. GrossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Goldberger, Seligsohn & Shinrod, P.A. v. BaumgartenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005