Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Isaac Winkler & Bro. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1931No. 5746PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The Board of Tax Appeals held that, as to certain income received in 1918, the taxpayer corporation was a “personal service corporation,” within the meaning of section 200 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1058), and hence was entitled to have its tax computed under the provisions of section 303 (40 Stat. 1089). In order to justify this conclusion, it was necessary to find three things (now disputed): First, that the income in question was derived from a distinctly separate branch of the trade or business; second, that the income of this separate branch was to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Avery v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  3. Tracy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shillito Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. Routzahn v. TyrolerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dulin v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  2. Doric Apartment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API