Legal Opinion

C I T Financial Services v. Egging Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1977No. 40917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

The plaintiff, C I T Financial Services of Kansas, brought this action to recover money under an alleged lease purchase agreement between plaintiff and defendant involving a Royal Bond copier. The plaintiff sought damages in the sum of $11,593.68, plus attorney’s fees and costs.

The defendant denied that it had entered into the lease purchase agreement which was the subject of the plaintiff’s claim and filed a counterclaim to re cover payments made to the plaintiff, attorney’s fees, and costs. In reply to the defendant’s counterclaim, the plaintiff alleged that Richard D. Flowers was the agent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank of Sapulpa v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Rodine v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hadenfeldt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Drainage District No. 2 v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Schmidt v. KnoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mustion v. EalyNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Western Fertilizer & Cordage Co. v. BRG, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hartman v. BradyNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. May v. Marijo Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sortino v. PaynterNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API