Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Woods

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 22, 2014No. 13-3105PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

James Woods and several others were indicted for participating in. a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. At trial, the government called Woods’s coconspirators. During direct and cross examination, they testified they had pleaded guilty to the conspiracy and entered a plea agreement with the government. They then went on to describe their involvement in Woods’s drug distribution ring.

Woods’s defense theory at trial was that he and the cooperating witnesses did not deal in methamphetamine, foreclosing Woods’s involvement in the charged conspiracy. Defense counsel…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Cargle v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Alphonso Pedraza, United States of America v. Peter Brent Irelan, United States of America v. Enrique PedrazaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Rosales-MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Marcus TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. VannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Torres-ColonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. EarlsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  5. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API