Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Fulcher
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided November 12, 1985No. MO-85-CA-061PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUNTON, District Judge.
The parties have stipulated to the relevant facts and agreed to submit all matters to the Court for determination. After reviewing the pleadings, exhibits, depositions and briefs of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION’S (“FDIC”) motion for summary judgment is meritorious and should be granted.
I
Facts
Defendant JAMES S. “BUTCH” FULCHER (“FULCHER”) executed a promissory note payable to the Metro Bank in the amount of $85,000 secured by a mortgage on a home. Defendant ROYAL CASWELL (“CASWELL”) executed and delivered to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Chatham Ventures, Inc., Scott Thompson and Laurie K. Abbott v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Chatham Ventures, Inc., Scott Thompson and Laurie K. Abbott v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Hoover-Morris Enterprises, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Manuel De Jesus Velez, Luis Dominguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. VogelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., in Its Corporate Capacity v. Cardinal Oil Well Servicing Co., Inc., Jim Cardinal, Don H. Wilson and Paul ConditCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Royal Palm Savings Ass'n v. Pine Trace Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. CoverDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1988