Legal Opinion

Hauptman v. Graehl

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1931No. 20429. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Minnie Hefner Hauptman, a daughter of Peter Lutje, and five of his grandchildren, who were the children of a deceased daughter, filed their bill October 4, 1929, in the circuit court of McLean county to contest the will of Peter Lutje. The complainants charged in their bill that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity, and that his daughter Mary Graehl, who received the greater portion of the estate, unduly influenced him and dominated his acts in the making of his will. After answers and replications were filed the cause was submitted to a jury, and a verdict was returned finding the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waters v. WatersIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Donovan v. St. Joseph's HomeIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Voodry v. Trustees of the University of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. McGrady v. McGradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Applehans v. JurgensonIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frese v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Biggerstaff v. WicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Kalnis v. WaitekIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API