Legal Opinion

Connor v. Buhl

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Assumpsit by Jeremiah Connor against Theodore D. Buhl for the breach of a contract for the exchange of land. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff Drought this action to recover damages for the breach of an executory contract for the exchange of land. The estate of C. H.. Buhl owned a farm of 768 acres of land in Monroe county; and plaintiff owned a large number of parcels of land in the city of Detroit, consisting of houses and lots, valued at something like $335,000, and incumbered in various amounts, aggregating $132,700, as was supposed. After some oral negotiations, defendant, on September 5, 1894, addressed the following letter to one F. B. Trout, who was acting for the plaintiff, and, as he testifies, for defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelsey v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Koch v. KochMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API