Legal Opinion

Hughley v. Saunders

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2009No. 2009-0530PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus of appellant, Kevin Hughley. Hughley’s petition was fatally defective and subject to dismissal because he failed to comply with the commitment-paper and verification requirements of R.C. 2725.04. Griffin v. McFaul, 116 Ohio St.3d 30, 2007-Ohio-5506, 876 N.E.2d 527, ¶4. Hughley’s petition failed to include specific facts to support his statement that his commitment papers and verification could not be obtained without impairing the efficiency of the remedy. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Goudlock v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Griffin v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Austin v. KnabOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Clark v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Stewart v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Burns v. Delaware Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API