McDaniel v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The plaintiff-appellant, Carol McDaniel, filed this appeal on May 20, 2004 from two orders of the Superior Court. The first order, dated February 5, 2004, granted summary judgment to the defendant-ap-pellee, DaimlerChrysler Corporation (DCC). The second order, dated April 26, 2004, denied McDaniel’s motion for rear-gument on the alternative grounds that the motion was untimely and that it lacked merit.
DCC has filed a motion to dismiss in part and affirm in part. According to DCC, this Court has lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of McDaniel’s appeal from the Superior…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Preform Building Components, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
3Cited by29 opinions
- Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- Whitfield v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Cahall v. ThomasSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Anderson v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2025
- Anderson v. Department of Health and Social ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.