Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 26, 2004No. 214, 2004PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The plaintiff-appellant, Carol McDaniel, filed this appeal on May 20, 2004 from two orders of the Superior Court. The first order, dated February 5, 2004, granted summary judgment to the defendant-ap-pellee, DaimlerChrysler Corporation (DCC). The second order, dated April 26, 2004, denied McDaniel’s motion for rear-gument on the alternative grounds that the motion was untimely and that it lacked merit.

DCC has filed a motion to dismiss in part and affirm in part. According to DCC, this Court has lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of McDaniel’s appeal from the Superior…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riggs v. RiggsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Preform Building Components, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  3. Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  2. Whitfield v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Cahall v. ThomasSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. Anderson v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2025
  5. Anderson v. Department of Health and Social ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API