Legal Opinion

Smith v. Davis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Bourbon District Court. The facts are sufficiently stated iu the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought in the district court of Bourbon county on November 4, 1887, by H. D. Smith against John E. Davis and Margaret L. Davis, husband and wife, to recover for an alleged breach of covenants contained in a deed of conveyance of real estate executed by the defendants to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's petition alleges *363and sets forth among other things that the deed contained the following covenants, to wit:

“And the said parties of the first part do hereby covenant and agree that at the delivery hereof they are the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bronson v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Fritz v. PuseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Hubbard v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  4. Black v. CoanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Williamson v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Westerlund v. Black Bear Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  2. Clark v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Bolinger v. BrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Gadow v. HunholzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bolinger v. BrakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API