Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oldham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 30, 1998No. 1350-94Published

1DissentBaird, Judge

Appellant was convicted of forgery and the trial judge assessed punishment at three years confinement. Tex. Penal Code § 32.21. The Court of Appeals remanded appellant’s case for a healing on appellant’s untimely motion for new trial. Oldham v. State, 889 S.W.2d 461 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994). After due consideration, we dismissed the State’s petition for discretionary review.1 Oldham v. State, 977 S.W.2d 569 (Tex.Cr.App.1996). Because a majority of the Court sustains the State’s motion for rehearing, I respectfully dissent.

I

Appellant was represented by retained counsel at trial. On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AxelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Whitmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API