Frankel Associates, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeckworth, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rattancore sleighs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Imported Merchandise Company v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 554, C.D. 2702), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of rattancore “wheel barrels” similar in all material respects to those the subject of Imported Merchandise Company v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 313, Abstract 68437), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Imported Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Imported Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966