Legal Opinion

Kirchner v. Buschling

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1995No. 65546PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

This is a will construction case. The children of a residuary beneficiary who predeceased the testator appeal the trial court’s judgment that the words “per capita and not per stirpes” were sufficient to override the Anti-Lapse Statute, § 474.460, RSMo 1986, thereby excluding them from sharing in the residue of the estate. We reverse and remand.

Alois Renner (Testator) died March 6, 1993, leaving a will dated January 31, 1984. It is the construction of the will’s residuary clause which is at issue on appeal. Article 4(b) of Testator’s will states the following:

All the rest and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Matter of Estate of WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Royston v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Binkley v. PalmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Estate of Straube v. BarberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Kubiczky v. Wesbanco Bank WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Estate of KuruzovichMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Karr v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API