Legal Opinion

Dacryn Corp. v. Peacock

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 29, 1993No. 92-03349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellants (Daeryn) urge this court to find that the trial court erred in dismissing with prejudice Counts X, XI and XII of their amended third party complaint. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

This action was brought by Ameriner Corporation as plaintiff against Daeryn. Ameri-ner had purchased certain property from Da-eryn pursuant to a warranty deed. Ameri-ner alleged that the State of Florida had asserted ownership to a substantial portion of the property conveyed to it by Daeryn, as sovereign navigable waters of the state. Ameriner sought damages and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Leggiere v. Merrill Lynch Realty/Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tsafatinos v. Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Kendall v. GilmoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API