Legal Opinion

Andrews v. . Long

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeals from orders of the General Term of the Supreme .Court, in the second judicial department, affirming orders of the County Court of Kings county, which in each case dismissed an appeal to that court from a judgment of a justice of the peace. (Reported below, 19 Hun, 303.)

1Per curiam

We see no answer to the point made by the respondent, that the appeal to the Supreme Court, from the order of the County Court, dismissing the plaintiff's appeal ~to that court, should have been dismissed by the Supreme Court, for the reason that the order of the County Court was not appealable. The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Com't over the judgments and orders of inferior courts is defined and regulated by sections 1340 to 1345 inclusive, of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The provisions .of the Old Code on this subject were repealed by chapter 417, Laws of 1877. Section 1340…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Health of Town of Brighton v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Ithaca Agricultural Works v. . EgglestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Kilts v. NeahrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Hamilton v. HeitzmanNew York Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hinman v. StillwellNew York Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API