Legal Opinion

McClanahan v. Caul

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Fayette County. Action by H. A. McClanahan against A. C. Caul and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BRannon, Judge:

Action of assumpsit in the circuit court of Fayette county on two promissory notes of $500 each by H. A. McClanahan against A. C. Caul and H. A. Scott. Pleas of non assumpsit and a special plea. Verdict and judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiff has appealed.

The plaintiff points out as error the admission of the special plea. That special plea states that three notes of $500 each had been given by the defendants to H. A. McClanahan as the price of a certain saloon and fixtures, and for the rent of a saloon building from 20th August, 1904, to the end of that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bodkin v. ArnoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. HarrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Sterling Organ Co. v. HouseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BraggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Interstate Finance Co. v. SchroderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. FriedmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API