Legal Opinion

John Q. Hammons Inc. v. Poletis

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1998No. 96-335PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

Andrew Poletis sued the owner of the Sheridan Holiday Inn, John Q. Hammons Inc., for injuries he sustained while a guest at the hotel. Following a jury verdict in favor of Poletis, John Q. Hammons Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Holiday Inn) moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial or reduction of the verdict. Holiday Inn now appeals the district court’s denial of its motion. We affirm.

Appellant Holiday Inn presents the following issue for our review:

1. Did the district court err in allowing the jury verdict to stand and not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Blakely v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Downen v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cody v. AtkinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Daily v. BoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lee v. LPP Mortgage Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Jensen v. Fremont Motors Cody, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Three Way, Inc. v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Sundown, Inc. v. Pearson Real Estate Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Nathan R. Baker and Bryner Farms, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. David Speaks and Elizabeth SpeaksWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API