Legal Opinion

Baker v. Copeland

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The defendant, having been illegally arrested in an action of tort returnable to the Superior Court, *343appeared specially in that court, and moved to dismiss the action for insufficiency of service. The court refused to allow the plaintiff to take out an order for further service, and dismissed the action. The plaintiff excepted to these proceedings of the Superior Court.

E. 0. Grilman $ O. M. Barnes, for the plaintiff. W. E. Powers, for the defendant.

By the Pub. Sts. c. 161, § 84, it is within the discretion of the court, if the service of a writ is defective or insufficient, to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carleton v. Akron Sewer Pipe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Kalloch v. ElwardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  3. Nickerson v. FalesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Luce v. Columbia River Packers Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Dickinson v. FarwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API