City of Pittsburgh v. Silver
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
*302CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge COVEY.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the Office of Open Records (OOR) does not have jurisdiction under the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL)1 to address the disclosure of documents in an attorney’s case file. However, I concur with the majority that the settlement negotiations are not subject to disclosure.
On October 1, 2010, Jonathan D. Silver and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (collectively the Gazette) submitted a request under the RTKL to the City of Pittsburgh (City) requesting access to and copies of all correspondence beginning…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Newspaper Holdings, Inc. v. New Castle Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006