Legal Opinion

McGuigan v. Carillo

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur W. Lonschein, J.

During the trial of this action, the attorney for the plaintiffs *882sought to read the deposition of the plaintiff which was taken by the defendant as an adverse party to the plaintiff. The plaintiff himself is presently in the State of Florida, and is not infirm, imprisoned, ill or unable to attend the trial because of age. Instead, according to his lawyer, he has no interest in this lawsuit, is afraid of flying and cannot be inconvenienced because he runs a business in Florida, and for these reasons his deposition is sought to be read. The defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spampinato v. A. B. C. Consolidated Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Jobse v. ConnollyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969
  3. Wojtas v. Fifth Avenue Coach Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. McGuigan v. CarilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API