Washington Insurance v. Slee
New York Court of Chancery
This was an application to stay the proceedings on a decree of sale, upon the ground that the suit had abated by the «death of one of the owners of the premises. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
A general decree was made in this cause, which exempted a part of the mortgaged premises from a sale, on account of particular equities which existed in favor of the defendants, who were the owners of those portions of the premises. The residue of the premises appears to have belonged to the defendants Stevens and Aikin; and Slee also held a mortgage on the part belonging to Aikin. The whole of that residue was ordered to be sold under the direction of master Drake, and the proceeds thereof to be applied to the payment of the mortgage money and costs; and the *366balance, if any,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Coit v. . Campbell, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Requa v. . HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Beach v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hochgraef v. HendrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Lynde v. O'DonnellNew York Supreme Court · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.