People v. Central City Bank
New York Supreme Court
APPEAL by the plaintiffs from an order made at a special term, refusing an attachment and other relief.
1Opinion of the CourtHogeboom, J.
The plaintiffs moved at a special term in the third district (where the venue was laid) for an order against Charles B. Sedgwick, Esq., of Syracuse, to show cause why the custody of the assets of said bank was withheld from L. Harris Hiscock, the receiver appointed therein by Justice Peckham; why an attachment should not issue against him, the said Sedgwick; why he should not be punished for his alleged misconduct; and why the order (of Justice Poster) appointing him, the said Sedgwick, receiver, should not be vacated.
The motion is made upon all the papers in the case, and it is necessary to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Foley v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
3Cited by15 opinions
- Eighmy v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- People v. McGarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Waters-Pierce Oil Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Gerity v. . Seeger Guernsey Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Worth v. Piedmont Bank of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.