Legal Opinion
United States v. Lacroix
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 27, 1994No. 93-1845PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This sentencing appeal provides an opportunity to clarify the operative standards for identifying relevant conduct under U.S.S.G. § lB1.8(a)(l)(B) (Nov.1993). 1 We seize the opportunity and, in the end, affirm the sentence imposed below.
I. BACKGROUND
For many years, defendant-appellant Evangelist LaCroix earned his livelihood as a building subcontractor in southern New Hampshire. He became acquainted with the brothers Zsofka, Matthew and Lazlos, who, through entities known as ZLM Realty and 101 Realty (the Zsofka entities), planned to develop a sizable single-family…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. William A. DietzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Fausto D. RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Dennis HarotunianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John L. St. CyrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- David v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Ausa Life Insurance Company, Bankers United Life Assurance Company, Crown Life Insurance Company, General Services Life Insurance Company, Life Investors Insurance Company of America, Modern Woodmen of America, Monumental Life Insurance Company, the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, and the Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Ernst and YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. LombardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.