Legal Opinion

Soto v. Doehne

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1981No. 16638PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLARK, Justice.

This suit arose from a written agreement between two certified public accountants concerning a transfer of accounts from one to the other. Doehne, the administrator of Lachica’s estate, sued Soto to recover unpaid consideration alleged to be due for the purchase of Lachica’s accounting practice. Soto contended the agreement was an employment contract whereby he had hired Laehica as a consultant, and that Lachica had already been paid more than he was entitled to receive. Trial was to the court. After admitting parol evidence as to the intent of the parties, the court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Butler v. HansonTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lone Star Gas Co. v. X-Ray Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. James Stewart & Co. v. LawTexas Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fuqua v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  2. Tribble & Stephens Co. v. Consolidated Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  3. Schismatic & Purported Casa Linda Presbyterian Church in America v. Grace Union Presbytery, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API