Legal Opinion

Love v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 19, 1996No. 95-405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

James Love, Jr., appeals from a district court order dismissing his application for postconviction relief. Love complains the prison disciplinary committee at the Iowa Men’s Reformatory (IMR) improperly found that he had violated rule 23. Additionally, his complaint raises procedural due process concerns.

Rule 23 is a major rule promulgated by the Iowa Department of Corrections (IDOC). Among other things, the rule provides that inmates commit a violation of the rule by failing to obey a (1) written or posted order, or (2) a verbal order given by any person in authority or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Speller v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Personal Restraint of GronquistWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Key v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1998
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of GronquistWashington Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API