Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Dixie Concrete, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1969No. 3488PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LeSUEUR Judge.

Plaintiff brought suit for Workmen’s Compensation benefits based on his being totally and permanently disabled. Defendant admits partial permanent disability but denies that plaintiff is totally and permanently disabled. The trial judge granted a judgment in favor of plaintiff and defendant appealed.

Plaintiff was employed by Dixie Concrete, Inc. on September 25, 1967 as what is known in the building material supply trade as a “batch man” when he stumbled on a loose board on his employer’s loading dock, falling to the ground some four-and-a-half to five feet below, breaking his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Rowan Drilling CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Lavergne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Smith v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Bellard v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Jarrell v. Maryland Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Falgoust v. Jefferson Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Johnson v. Guastella Construction & Realty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Perkins v. Southern Casualty InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Bustillo v. Boudreaux & Dane Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Smith v. Continental Grain Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API