Legal Opinion

Francis Snider v. All State Administrators, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 21, 1974No. 73-731PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Snider has filed a motion to dispense with the printing of the petition for certiorari as required by our Rule 39. He has filed no motion and affidavit in conformity with our Rule 53, dealing with proceedings in forma pauperis. While we undoubtedly have authority to waive the application of particular rules in appropriate circumstances, we have during this Term denied a considerable number of similar motions. * Typically in each of these cases the moving petitioner made generalized allegations of inability to afford payment of printing costs, but made no showing sufficient to…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Patterson v. CroninSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Panko v. RodakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. Samuel Richard Harrell v. T. M. Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. John Bowers, as Trustee of Local 1575, International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. Eusebio G. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
  5. Panko v. RodakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API