Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Robert Matheny, Sheriff v. Lieutenant Gregory Scolapio

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2017No. 16-0840Published

1ConcurrenceLoughry, Chief Justice

I concur with the majority's decision to affirm the circuit court's order finding that the Sheriff was an interested party entitled to intervene in the proceedings below and that Lieutenant Scolapio should have been afforded a de novo hearing before the Harrison County Civil Service Commission for Deputy Sheriffs. I write separately because the majority decision misconstrues Burgess v. Moore, 224 W.Va. 291, 685 S.E.2d 685 (2009), and ignores the plain language of West Virginia Code § 7-14C-3(b) (2015), resulting in a failure to recognize that certain instances of misconduct can be so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brooke B. v. Donald Ray C., IIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Burgess v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API