Legal Opinion
In Re Appeal of Busik
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 9, 2000PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLINS, Judge.
Before the Court is the issue of whether a subdivision applicant who accepts a condition on preliminary approval and does not appeal from that approval and imposition of condition has waived his right to challenge that condition on final approval. Solebury Township appeals from the December 28, 1998 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court) directing that the proposed subdivision plan of J. Kevan and Julia K. Busik (the Busiks) be deemed approved and striking Condition No. 4, which required the Busiks to enter into an agreement with neighboring landowners.
T…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doylestown Township v. TeelingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Bonner v. Upper Makefield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Montgomery Township v. Franchise Realty Interstate Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Board of Township Commissioners v. LivengoodCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Board of Supervisors v. West Chestnut Realty Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- East Capitol View Community Development Corp. v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- S. Davis-Haas v. Exeter Twp. ZHB and MetroDev V, LP and Exeter Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Albright v. Lombardo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2010
- E.R. Thompson and L. Del Gotto v. Board of Supervisors of Warrington TwpCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- In Re Appeal of BusikCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.