Legal Opinion

Huff v. Earl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1852PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This was an action of debt, brought by the appellant against the appellees, upon a replevin-bond.

The declaration alleges that, on the 22d of February, 1840, one Forseman, who has since died, filed in the office of the-clerk of the Fountain Circuit Court, an affidavit stating, that the affiant and Earl, one of the defendants in the present suit, were the joint owners of the pork, hams, and lard of 510 hogs, which were unjustly detained from them by John Sherry, William Sherry, Montgomery Sherry, Jacob Sherry, and Jesse Sherry; whereupon a writ of replevin issued, by virtue of which the sheriff…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brackenridge v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Stipp v. Washington Hall Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1841

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Grandfield v. HinkleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Matthews v. PorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1878
  3. Hawkins v. RaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Haynie v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API