Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sustainable Growth Initiative Committee v. Jumpers, LLC

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2006No. 41118Published

1Dissent

Parraguirre, J., with whom Becker, J.,

agrees, dissenting:

Initially, I emphasize the importance of the initiative process and acknowledge the Douglas County electorate’s laudable efforts in using the democratic process to preserve the current state of their community. However, I cannot join the majority’s decision.

The Douglas County Master Plan, more than 400 pages long, was adopted in 1996 for one reason: to provide Douglas County with a comprehensive plan for future development and management of growth for the next twenty years. I recognize that limiting growth is an important concern of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Beck v. Town of RaymondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. City of Boca Raton v. Boca Villas Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. City of Hollywood v. Hollywood, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Inn. Motor Lodge v. CITY, NEW SMYRNA BEACHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API