American Car & Foundry Co. v. USS
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Action by William Uss against the American Car & Foundry Company. ' Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
This was a suit for personal injuries. The defendant in error, William Uss, hereafter called the plaintiff, was born in Russian Poland, and was at the time of the trial 23 years old. When he came to this country is not shown, but he had to testify through an interpreter at the trial, as he spoke Polish. He had worked for some five months as a common laborer for the plaintiff in error, the American Car & Foundry Company, hereafter called the defendant. At first he worked in the defendant’s yards, but at the end of a couple of months he was transferred to the duty hereafter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Wabash Railway Co. v. McDanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Kreigh v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Canadian Northern Ry. Co. v. SenskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Deserant v. Cerillos Coal RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. George W. LintCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Haskins v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Rivera Maldonado v. Central Pasto Viejo, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1932
- Miranda Vda. de Rodríguez v. Méndez RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.