Mabury v. Ruiz
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment in the Seventeenth District Court, County of Los Angeles, Sepulveda, J., and from an order denying a motion for a new trial in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County by the same Judge. ■ A decision in this case was made by Department Two, January 6th, 1881, affirming the order denying a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Thornton, J.:
In this action, which was brought to foreclose a mortgage by one claiming to be the assignee of the note and mortgage sued on, the sole mortgagor, José Dolores Ruiz, together with Dolores S. de Abila and D. B. Hoffman, were made defend*13ants. The note and mortgage above mentioned were executed on the 27th of June, 1877. The defendants, failing to answer, were regularly defaulted. One Salvadora Ruiz, by leave of the Court, filed a complaint in intervention, in which she alleged that on the 31st of December, 1872, and prior thereto, she was, and thereafter continued, the wife of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moss v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Sargent v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by9 opinions
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- MacLeod v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Platte Water Co. v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Fitzgerald v. FernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.