Legal Opinion

Follett v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 3, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, as the result of alleged negligent operation of' a train of the defendant, which struck a motor truck driven by the intestate as it was proceeding over a railroad crossing at Vernon in the State of Vermont. (See Vermont P. L. §§ 2859, 2860.) The case was tried to a jury and at the close of the evidence the judge allowed the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, subject to the plaintiff’s exception.

There was evidence to warrant a finding of the following facts. The train involved was owned and operated by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boston & M. R. R. v. DanielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. Durkee v. Delaware & Hudson RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  3. Tamkun v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Barton v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  3. McNally v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Pooles v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API