Legal Opinion

Sabine River Authority v. All Taxpayers

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 2011No. 11-1139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMY, Judge.

liThe Sabine River Authority (the “SRA”) seeks to commence a bond initiative to generate revenue. The SRA filed a motion for judgment seeking a judicial declaration that the bonds and the means by which they would be secured and paid were valid. No interested person challenged the bond resolution or the motion for judgment. The trial court denied the SRA’s motion, finding that although the SRA complied with the statute governing bond validation, the court had concerns about the funds to be used for the security of the bonds. The SRA filed this expedited appeal. For the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conagra Poultry Co. v. CollingsworthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. FrantzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Denham Springs Economic Development District v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners & Citizens of the Denham Springs Economic Development DistrictSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  4. Smith v. Parish of East Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Health Educ. Auth. of La. v. Apcoa Lasalle Parking Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority v. All TaxpayersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API