Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Cardamone

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 6, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 86-2180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

This pro se plaintiff has filed what purports to be an action under Section 1983 for injuries he experienced while in F.C.I.— Phoenix, Arizona. Plaintiff has moved for a physical examination and for appointment of counsel. Defendant has moved to dismiss this action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (2), (3), and (6), or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. After carefully considering these motions, the entire record in this case, and the underlying law, the Court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss.

The Court notes that plaintiffs action may not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. James E. Lewis v. D. C. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. Dr. Thomas C. Sturgeon v. Federal Prison Industries, Attorney General, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burnside v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  2. Fontanez v. BerberDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  3. Jordan v. US Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  4. Maloy v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API