Legal Opinion

Tompkins v. Hall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 18, 2012No. S12A0489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

Following the grant of a petition for habeas corpus relief brought by Robert Nathaniel Hall, Billy Tompkins, Warden, appeals, contending that the trial court erred in its finding that cause and prejudice had been shown to raise the procedural bar on defaulted claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

Hall, along with co-defendants Joseph Scurry, Kevin Taylor, Demetra Stallings, and Norval Patten, was tried and convicted on November 8, 2002 for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and trafficking in cocaine. Hall, who…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Turpin v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  2. Sullivan v. KempSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API