Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 20, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bbown, S. C. C.

This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer filed by the defendants on the ground that the pleading is sham. According to the complaint the defendant Commonwealth Casualty Company on the 5th day of July, 1929, issued a policy of insurance to one Benjamin R. Sarsons, in which policy it was agreed'—• •

“To pay all sums which the assured shall become liable to pay as damages imposed by law for bodily injuries (including death at any time resulting therefrom) caused as the result *302of the ownership, maintenance or use of any automobile…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pearl Assur. Co., Ltd. v. WattsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Sutera v. Provident Ins. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Lakewood Judean Lodge No. 1351 v. Township of LakewoodNew Jersey Tax Court · 1947
  4. Appeal of Majob Realty Corp. v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Tax Court · 1947
  5. Richard Chowning v. Nationwide Insurance Company of America; Allied Insurance Company of America; Nationwide Argibusiness Insurance Company; Titan Insurance Company Inc.; Victoria Fire & Casualty Company and Does I - V, and Roe Corporations I - V, inclusiveDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API