Legal Opinion

Carroll v. McKale

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Ingham; Person, J. Replevin by Joseph E. Carroll against William H. McKale. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action in replevin for a Columbia bicycle, taken frQm possession of defendant, who, as deputy sheriff, seized the same on a writ of execution in favor of Fred Haines, and running against the property of one Smoyer. The issue was whether the property was the property of Smoyer at the time of its seizure, or the property of plaintiff. The circuit judge directed a verdict for plaintiff, and the question is whether there was any testimony tending to support the title of Smoyer.

There was testimony on the part of the defendant which tended to show that Smoyer was the owner of an equity…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dowd v. . HolbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API