Legal Opinion

Meszaros v. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 21, 2003No. 5D03-791PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPleus, J.

Homeowners Elizabeth and Frank Meszaros appeal from an immediate final order (IFO) of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Department), advising them that their citrus trees would be destroyed because they were located within 1900 feet of trees diseased with citrus canker. The Meszaroses argue that the Department erred in issuing the IFO because their citrus trees constitute an acceptable level of risk. The standard for reviewing this order is whether the IFO was “lawfully entered” and “not defective.” Markus v. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 785…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Denney v. ConnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Nordmann v. Florida Dept. of AgricultureDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Sapp Farms, Inc. v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Markus v. FLA. DEPT. OF AGRICULTUREDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Hobbs v. Department of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. G.A. Mack v. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API