Legal Opinion

Ward v. Stutzman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Now. Drniet E. Bird, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.

This is a proceeding involving a construction of the “Bulk Sales” Law, found in Laws 1913, page 163.

*377The defendant, Ora Stutzman, owned a stock of jewelry and fixtures and on the 28th of August, 1914, sold them to Elsie Maupin, the claimant herein.' The requirements of that law as to notice to creditors, etc., were not complied with. In the following April, Stutzman confessed judgment in favor of Ward & Co., the plaintiff herein. About two weeks thereafter plaintiff had execution issued on this judgment and the sheriff levied it on the stock of jewelry then in possession of claimant Maupin as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joplin Supply Co. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Dickinson v. HarbisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Riley Pennsylvania Oil Co. v. SymmondsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. SacksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Gallup v. RhodesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Vaughan v. TylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Douglass Candy Co. v. ShenkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API