Legal Opinion

In re Kalmus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 27, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*47OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Motion by the petitioner to strike the name of the respondent, Keith John Kalmus, from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), upon the ground that the respondent has been automatically disbarred by virtue of a felony conviction.

On January 25, 2006, the respondent appeared with counsel before Judge Andrew A. Crecca, in the County Court, Suffolk County, and pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the second degree, Penal Law § 125.15, a class C felony, vehicular manslaughter in the second degree, Penal Law § 125.12, a class D felony,…

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BenedictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. In re BenedictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API