Claim of Carrasquilla v. Penn Akron Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1ConcurrenceReynolds, J.
I concur with the reversal and remittance for a further development of the facts. Despite the concession of claimant’s counsel before the board that this fall occurred on a public sidewalk, viewing the meager record as a whole, the exact spot and the ownership of the sidewalk where she fell is still left in doubt. The marks on the photographs seemingly conflict with the oral testimony. If the fall was on a private sidewalk belonging to the employer it would have been compensable since the claimant would have entered on the employer’s premises and attached herself to the employment (Matter of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Claim of Leatham v. Thurston & BraidichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Claim of Leatham v. Thurston & BraidichNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Claim of Manville v. New York State Department of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Claim of Amento v. Bond Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Claim of Flanagan v. Ward Leonard Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.