Legal Opinion

G.C. S.F. Ry. Co. v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1893No. 322PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At a former day of this term the judgment in this case was affirmed without written opinion. It is earnestly urged by appellant's counsel, in his motion for a rehearing, that this court erred in not reversing the judgment, because of the admission in evidence of the testimony offered by the plaintiff to prove the decline in the market value of sheep in Kansas City between the 4th and 6th days of May, 1889.

The objections are that the testimony is hearsay, and that the witnesses had not qualified themselves to give opinions as to market value.

Appellant's bill of exceptions number 1 shows that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Pacific Railway Co. v. R. E. Maddox & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crutcher v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. VossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API